The Miranda Warning :: essays research papers

The Miranda exemplificationFor the past decade, many Right take flight organizations have sort to change many of the law of natures, g everyplacening our rights and freedom. These laws were passed by sexual congress and upheld by the Supreme judicature. The Miranda Warning is one of these laws. The Miranda Warning is intended to nourish the guilty as well as the innocent and should be protect at all costs. Without the law, many suspects may be treated unfairly. It is a necessary safeguard.     Miranda is a ruling which says that the accused have the right to expect silent and prosecutors may not use statements made by them spell in jurisprudence custody, unless the natural law advice them of their rights. In other words, a police officer must inform a suspect of this fundamental right, under(a) the Fifth Amendment, at the time of their arrest and or interrogation. Miranda protect unknowledgeable suspects from incriminating themselves.       Miranda also protects suspects from overzealous police officers. Although most law-enforcement agents in the joined States are decent men and women, some abuse their power. They may accentuate to coerce suspects into giving false confessions. Time and time again, we read of cases where suspects were coerce to make confessions because an overzealous or prejudiced police officers want to snug a case. The story of Rubin Hurricane Carter, made popular by the motion impression of the same name, demonstrated how lives could be destroyed when vindictive and manipulating detectives abuse their power. The Miranda Warning helps keep abuses in check. If the law is used correctly, the guilty would receive their cod punishment. When police officers inform suspects of their rights before interrogation, it is very unlikely that the judge presiding over any case would throw out statements made during questioning.      Many laid-back ranking law enforcement agents around the country support the Miranda Warning die hard because it is a necessary safeguard it helps and does not hinders the judicial process. William J. Bratton former police commissioner for the New York City Police Department said, "Miranda works at a minimal social cost. The Supreme Court should reaffirm a finish that has served this country well."I believe that the Miranda warning protects all citizens, guilty and innocent, victim and perpetrator, from unscrupulous officers. The law was designed to insure that the statement given is military volunteer and not extracted by force or coercion. Many courts including the Supreme Court have made thousands of decisions using the Miranda ruling without any indication that the law was unconstitutional or benefit criminals.